The Wild Mammals of Fort A.P. Hill

A Biodiversity Haven in Virginia's Upper Coastal Plain

Explore Wildlife

An Unlikely Sanctuary

Nestled in the upper Coastal Plain of Caroline County, Virginia, Fort A.P. Hill presents a fascinating paradox. Established in 1941 as a 30,329-hectare military training installation, this active Army base has unexpectedly become a crucial refuge for wildlife.

Named for Civil War Confederate Lt. General Ambrose Powell Hill, the installation's landscape features a rich mosaic of habitats ranging from old fields to mature hardwood forests. This diverse environment supports a remarkable community of mammals, making Fort A.P. Hill an increasingly valuable habitat island in a region where agriculture and development are transforming the natural landscape.

Through meticulous scientific study conducted since 1997, researchers have uncovered the installation's critical role in preserving the mammalian fauna of Virginia's upper Coastal Plain and the broader mid-Atlantic region 1 .

40+ Species

Documented mammal species thriving in the installation

7 Habitats

Distinct habitat types creating ecological niches

Protected Oasis

Military installation serving as wildlife sanctuary

A Tapestry of Habitats and Their Inhabitants

The remarkable diversity of mammals at Fort A.P. Hill is sustained by seven distinct habitat types that create varied ecological niches. Each habitat supports different components of the mammal community, with some species showing strong preferences for specific environmental conditions 1 .

Old Fields & Clearcuts

Support 20 mammal species, including several that are predominantly found in this early-successional habitat.

High Diversity
Pine Stands & Plantations

Support the fewest mammal species (17) due to their simplified structure and limited resources.

Low Diversity
Mixed & Hardwood Forests

Support 29-36 species, offering the most diverse resources and complex canopy structure.

Highest Diversity
Riparian Forests

Support particularly rich mammal communities with higher capture rates and moisture-rich environments.

Rich Community

Mammal Diversity by Habitat Type

Habitat Type Number of Species Supported Notable Characteristics
Old Fields & Clearcuts 20 Early successional habitat; supports field-specific species
Pine Stands & Plantations 17 Lowest diversity; simplified structure
Mixed Pine-Hardwood Forests 29-36 High structural diversity; abundant resources
Hardwood Forests 29-36 Complex canopy; rich food sources
Riparian Forests 29-36 Moisture-rich; supports highest capture rates
Habitat Diversity Visualization

The Mammal Community: From Tiny Shrews to Majestic Deer

Fort A.P. Hill is home to forty documented mammal species representing a wide range of ecological roles and taxonomic groups. This diversity includes one marsupial, five insectivores, nine chiropterans (bats), one lagomorph (rabbit), twelve rodents, ten carnivores, and one cervid (deer) 1 .

White-tailed Deer

As the only cervid species on the installation, white-tailed deer play a crucial ecological role. Management programs have successfully addressed overpopulation issues that occurred prior to 1996, with annual harvests between 1985-2000 ranging from 460 to 1,765 animals, demonstrating the dynamic nature of wildlife management 1 .

Eastern Coyote

These intelligent canines have expanded their territory across Virginia since the 1970s, filling the ecological niche once occupied by wolves. Larger than their western cousins due to historical wolf hybridization, they help control rodent populations and maintain ecosystem balance through their adaptable feeding habits 2 .

Virginia Opossum

As North America's only marsupial, the opossum represents a living connection to ancient mammal evolution. These nocturnal creatures consume thousands of disease-carrying ticks annually and possess natural immunity to snake venom, making them valuable contributors to ecosystem health 2 .

American Black Bear

While not explicitly mentioned in the Fort A.P. Hill studies, black bears represent the largest carnivore in the region and are known to inhabit Virginia's Coastal Plain, serving as an apex predator that helps maintain ecosystem balance 2 .

Taxonomic Diversity of Mammals

Taxonomic Group Number of Species Representative Examples
Marsupials 1 Virginia Opossum
Insectivores 5 Northern Short-tailed Shrew
Bats 9 Indiana Bat, Virginia Big-eared Bat
Lagomorphs 1 Eastern Cottontail
Rodents 12 White-footed Mouse, Eastern Gray Squirrel
Carnivores 10 Coyote, Bobcat, Raccoon
Cervids 1 White-tailed Deer
Taxonomic Distribution

Scientific Spotlight: The Riparian vs. Upland Habitat Study

Experimental Design and Methodology

One particularly insightful study conducted at Fort A.P. Hill compared small mammal communities between riparian (stream corridor) and nearby upland habitats in the installation's hardwood forest ecosystem. The research was conducted from April to October 1998, with an additional winter sample in January 1999 .

The experimental design featured:

  • Site Selection: Fourteen sites (7 paired riparian-upland locations) were selected to enable direct comparison between habitat types
  • Capture Methods: Researchers employed a combination of small-scale drift fence/pitfall trap arrays and snap traps
  • Sampling Effort: Standardized trapping efforts across all sites to enable statistical comparison
  • Vegetation Analysis: Documented plant community composition to understand relationship between flora and mammal distribution
Research Methods
Drift Fence/Pitfall Trap Arrays

Effective for capturing shrews, salamanders, and other small, ground-dwelling species

Snap Traps

Standardized method for sampling small mammal populations, especially rodents

Live Trapping & Imaging

Box traps, cage traps, night vision and thermal imaging for observation

Key Findings and Ecological Insights

The study revealed several important patterns in small mammal distribution and abundance :

  • Species Richness: The number of species did not significantly differ between riparian and upland habitats, with seven small mammal species captured overall
  • Population Density: Riparian sites supported higher numbers of individual small mammals, with capture rates averaging 2.6 individuals per trap night compared to 1.4 in upland sites
  • Community Composition: Small mammal communities in both habitats were dominated by white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) and northern short-tailed shrews (Blarina brevicauda)
  • Habitat Distinctness: Plant communities showed greater distinction between habitat types, with riparian areas supporting wetland and moist soil obligate plants
  • Rodent vs. Insectivore Patterns: Captures of rodents significantly outnumbered insectivores in both habitat types

These findings demonstrated that while riparian areas support denser populations, the small mammal species in both habitat types are largely the same. The research highlighted the importance of considering contiguous upland habitats in studies of riparian ecosystems, as mammals freely move between these connected environments.

Riparian vs. Upland Results
Research Metric Riparian Upland
Avg. Captures/Trap Night 2.6 1.4
Number of Species 7 7
Dominant Species Peromyscus leucopus, Blarina brevicauda
Plant Distinctness High Low
Capture Rate Comparison

Conservation Significance and Future Outlook

The research conducted at Fort A.P. Hill reveals the installation's growing importance as a conservation stronghold. As habitat loss accelerates in surrounding areas due to agricultural expansion and forestry practices, this military installation has inadvertently become a protected oasis for Virginia's mammalian fauna 1 .

Habitat Mosaic

Maintaining a diversity of habitat types is crucial for supporting complete mammal communities

Forest Preservation

Mature hardwood and riparian forests support the greatest diversity of species and require protection

Informed Management

Ongoing monitoring informs both military land management and broader conservation strategies

Beyond the Battlefield

Fort A.P. Hill stands as a compelling example of how managed landscapes, even those dedicated to national defense, can simultaneously serve as important reservoirs of biological diversity. The forty mammal species documented on the installation represent not just a checklist of inhabitants, but a complex web of ecological relationships that have persisted despite surrounding landscape changes.

References