Exploring the fascinating cognitive abilities of chimpanzees through Ben Garrod's research and recent scientific discoveries
Thinking about thinking
Updating beliefs with evidence
Complex problem-solving
Complex social dynamics
Renowned evolutionary biologist Professor Ben Garrod stood face-to-face with a chimpanzee that would change his life forever.
As he recounts in his book, The Chimpanzee and Me, this wasn't a mere chance encounter but the beginning of a profound relationship that would illuminate our understanding of our closest living relatives 5 . Garrod's personal journey into chimpanzee conservation and cognition introduces readers to a world where the lines between human and animal intelligence blur in fascinating ways.
His book, described as a "carefully crafted account of the current status of our nearest living nonhuman relations," serves as both a compelling narrative and a stark reminder of the threats these remarkable creatures face—from habitat destruction to the bush meat trade 5 .
But beyond the conservation message lies an even more intriguing story: what chimpanzees can teach us about the nature of intelligence itself. Recent breakthroughs in primate cognition research have revealed that chimpanzees possess cognitive abilities once considered exclusively human, particularly in the realm of rational thought and belief revision. These findings are reshaping not only our understanding of chimpanzees but of the very evolution of the human mind.
Ben Garrod's personal and scientific exploration of our closest living relatives.
Highlighting threats to chimpanzees and the importance of preservation.
For centuries, Western philosophical tradition has championed Aristotle's view that humans are the sole "rational animal" on Earth 1 . This perspective suggested that while animals might respond to stimuli, only humans could truly reason about evidence and consciously update their beliefs. Recent research has systematically dismantled this assumption, revealing that chimpanzees engage in sophisticated cognitive processes that mirror fundamental aspects of human reasoning.
At the core of this new understanding is metacognition—the ability to think about one's own thinking . This capacity enables chimpanzees to weigh different types of evidence and adjust their beliefs when confronted with stronger information.
Studies have demonstrated that great apes possess stable cognitive abilities that respond to developmental conditions, much like humans 4 . These aren't just random responses but represent enduring cognitive traits.
Neurobiological research further supports these behavioral findings. A 2023 study published in PNAS revealed that overlapping anatomical circuitry is involved in cognitive abilities in both humans and chimpanzees 2 . The researchers identified a conserved structural backbone for cognition that likely evolved before the divergence of chimpanzees and humans, suggesting our thinking brains share more in common than we previously assumed.
| Cognitive Ability | Description | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Belief Revision | Updating beliefs when presented with stronger evidence | Demonstrates flexibility beyond simple stimulus response 1 |
| Metacognition | Awareness of one's own thought processes | Allows evaluation of reliability of knowledge |
| Causal Reasoning | Understanding cause-effect relationships | Enables problem-solving and tool use 4 8 |
| Numerical Cognition | Quantity discrimination and basic math operations | Foundation for mathematical thinking 4 |
| Social Cognition | Following gaze, understanding social dynamics | Supports complex social group functioning 4 |
Humans and chimpanzees share overlapping brain networks for cognitive functions, suggesting a common evolutionary origin for complex thinking 2 .
One of the most compelling demonstrations of chimpanzee rationality comes from a groundbreaking series of experiments conducted at the Ngamba Island Chimpanzee Sanctuary in Uganda and published in the journal Science in 2025 1 6 . Psychologist Hanna Schleihauf and her team designed an elegant experimental paradigm to test whether chimpanzees could rationally revise their beliefs when presented with new evidence.
Chimpanzees were presented with two boxes and shown different types of evidence for each. Strong evidence involved seeing the apple placed in the box or seeing it through clear Perspex, while weak evidence consisted of merely hearing a rattle or seeing crumbs 1 .
The order of evidence presentation was manipulated. When strong evidence came before weak evidence, chimps tended to stick with their original choice. When weak evidence came first, they frequently changed their minds after receiving strong evidence for the alternative 1 .
Researchers added a third box with no evidence, then removed the strong-evidence box. Chimpanzees predominantly chose the weak-evidence box over the no-evidence box 1 .
Chimps heard either the same piece of food rattling twice (redundant evidence) or the sound of a second piece of food being added (new evidence). They consistently preferred the new evidence 1 .
In the most sophisticated test, chimpanzees discovered that earlier evidence was misleading—the "apple" was just a picture or the rattle came from a rock. They consistently rejected the misleading evidence in favor of more reliable cues 1 .
The findings were striking. Chimpanzees demonstrated a sophisticated capacity to evaluate evidence quality, integrate new information, and discard previously held beliefs when they were proven unreliable 1 . In the crucial false evidence experiment, the chimpanzees recognized they had been misled and switched their choices accordingly—something the researchers considered "the cherry on top" of their findings .
"It's very hard to explain the chimps' behavior without appealing to some notion of reflection"
Computational models confirmed that the chimpanzees' decision-making aligned with rational strategies of belief revision rather than simpler cognitive strategies 6 .
| Experimental Condition | Key Behavioral Response | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Strong vs. Weak Evidence | Preferred strong visual over weak auditory evidence | Can evaluate quality of different evidence types 1 |
| Weak then Strong Evidence | Changed initial choice when better evidence emerged | Willingness to revise beliefs rationally 1 |
| Redundant vs. New Evidence | Preferred new over redundant evidence | Distinguish between informative and uninformative evidence 1 |
| False Evidence Condition | Rejected previously believed misleading cues | Ability to recognize and discount unreliable evidence 1 |
| No-Evidence Comparison | Preferred weak evidence over no evidence | Understand difference between uncertain and completely unknown 1 |
Understanding how researchers study chimpanzee cognition requires familiarity with the essential tools and materials used in this field. The combination of controlled laboratory-style experiments and naturalistic observation provides complementary insights into the chimpanzee mind.
| Research Material | Function/Application | Example Use |
|---|---|---|
| Perspex Boxes with Clear Sides | Allow partial visibility of contents | Testing visual evidence evaluation in belief revision experiments 1 |
| Termite Fishing Probes | Natural tool use assessment | Studying material selection and flexibility understanding 8 |
| Cognitive Test Batteries | Standardized assessment of multiple domains | Measuring relational reasoning, processing speed in comparative studies 2 |
| MRI and Brain Imaging Technology | Mapping neural connectivity | Identifying shared brain networks for cognition in humans and chimps 2 |
| Primate Sanctuaries and Research Centers | Controlled yet ethical research environments | Conducting longitudinal studies with known individuals 1 5 |
Chimpanzees demonstrate sophisticated understanding of material properties in tool selection and use.
Controlled experiments help researchers understand the chimpanzee mind in ethical research settings.
Observations of natural social behaviors reveal complex social intelligence in chimpanzee communities.
The materials highlighted in the table represent just a sample of the sophisticated toolkit researchers employ. The termite fishing probes are particularly interesting—researchers discovered that chimpanzees selectively choose plant materials that produce more flexible implements, suggesting they understand material properties and their functional applications 8 . This technical knowledge of material science in wild chimpanzees provides crucial insights into the cognitive capabilities of early hominins, whose perishable tools haven't survived in the archaeological record 8 .
The implications of these findings extend far beyond academic interest. The demonstration that chimpanzees share fundamental cognitive processes with humans strengthens the ethical imperative for their conservation. Garrod's book powerfully highlights the precarious situation of wild chimpanzees, threatened by habitat destruction, the bush meat trade, and the pet trade 5 .
"There's no need to search the stars for intelligence akin to our own. We already know we're not alone. There are beings here, considering the world in a way that we think of as being rational"
The recognition of chimpanzee rationality also challenges us to reconsider the human place in the natural world. What makes humans unique may not be raw reasoning power but how we deploy it socially. As Hanna Schleihauf suggests, "This is really what makes humans so special. We give and ask for reasons" . Some cognitive scientists now believe our reasoning skills evolved primarily to navigate complex social landscapes and engage in persuasive communication with others.
The picture emerging from current research suggests that human rationality likely evolved from cognitive abilities already present in our shared ancestor with chimpanzees millions of years ago 1 2 . Rather than a dramatic evolutionary leap, the difference between human and chimpanzee cognition appears to be one of degree and specialization.
Language networks
Spatial working memory
Common cognitive backbone
References to be manually added here.