The Association Between Invasiveness and Mating Systems in Introduced Iridaceae to Australia
Picture a quiet Australian landscape gradually being transformed by an uninvited guest—a plant from a distant continent, now spreading relentlessly across its new home.
This silent invasion repeats itself across ecosystems worldwide, with biological invasions consistently ranking among the top five threats to global biodiversity 6 . Among the most successful plant invaders in Australia are members of the Iridaceae family, a group that includes familiar garden plants like irises and freesias.
What makes these particular plants so adept at conquering new territories may lie not in what they look like, but in how they reproduce.
Scientists are increasingly focusing on the hypothesis that a plant's mating system may powerfully predict its potential to become invasive.
To understand the invasion dynamics of plants, we must first become fluent in the language of plant reproduction. The sexual system of a species describes the distribution of male and female functions across individuals in a population 1 .
| Sexual System | Description | Advantage for Invasion |
|---|---|---|
| Dioecy | Individual plants are either male or female; requires cross-pollination between separate individuals | Poor - requires mates |
| Monoecy | Male and female flowers occur on the same individual; can self-pollinate or outcross | Moderate - flexible mating |
| Self-compatibility | Hermaphroditic flowers that can fertilize themselves; no need for pollen from other plants | Excellent - can found populations alone |
| Andromonoecy | Plants have both male and hermaphroditic flowers | Moderate - can self-pollinate via hermaphroditic flowers |
| Gynodioecy | Populations include females and hermaphrodites | Variable - depends on ratio |
This variation in sexual systems has profound implications for what happens when plants are transported to new environments. A self-compatible plant arriving in Australia without its native pollinators can still reproduce, while a dioecious species would languish in reproductive limbo 1 .
Why would mating systems be linked to invasion success? Several compelling theories explain this connection.
For plants establishing in new territories, finding mates or appropriate pollinators can be challenging. Self-compatible species carry a massive advantage—they can produce offspring even when isolated.
This concept proposes that species capable of uniparental reproduction are more likely to establish successfully after long-distance dispersal. The principle has been aptly summarized as "the best colonizer is a self-fertilizing hermaphrodite" 1 .
While self-fertilization provides short-term advantages for establishment, it comes at a cost—reduced genetic diversity. Many successful invaders can self-fertilize when necessary but occasionally outcross to generate genetic diversity.
To rigorously test whether reproductive traits can predict invasiveness, a research team designed an elegant experiment that compared invasive and non-invasive plants in their native ranges 6 .
Identified five pairs of closely related plant species growing sympatrically in their native range 6 .
Each pair included one species known to be invasive elsewhere and one non-invasive species.
Measured key demographic traits: size, fecundity, and reproductive frequency.
Used phylogenetic comparative methods to account for evolutionary relationships.
| Species Pair | Family | Size Ratio (Invasive:Non-invasive) |
|---|---|---|
| Cerastium | Caryophyllaceae | 1.80 |
| Silene | Caryophyllaceae | 1.60 |
| Calluna/Erica | Ericaceae | 1.54 |
| Rhinanthus/Pedicularis | Scrophulariaceae | 1.45 |
| Average | 1.60 |
Invasive species were consistently larger—approximately 60% larger on average—than their non-invasive relatives 6 .
| Species Pair | Fecundity Ratio (Invasive:Non-invasive) |
|---|---|
| Cerastium | 2.74 |
| Silene | 4.86 |
| Calluna/Erica | 0.50 |
| Rhinanthus/Pedicularis | 0.85 |
| Average | 2.24 |
| Species Status | Fecundity per Unit Size |
|---|---|
| Invasive | 15.56 |
| Non-invasive | 7.51 |
The data shows that invasive species don't just produce more seeds because they're bigger—they also have constitutively higher fecundity for their size 6 .
This research provides compelling evidence that size and fecundity—key components of reproductive strategy—are reliable predictors of invasiveness. From a conservation perspective, these findings are golden—they suggest we can identify potential invaders before they're introduced by screening for these simple traits.
The Iridaceae family in Australia provides a fascinating case study for examining these principles. This plant family, best known for ornamental species like irises and gladioli, has representatives with diverse mating systems.
Iridaceae species employ the full spectrum of plant mating systems. While many species have hermaphroditic flowers with both male and female organs, their compatibility systems vary dramatically.
A striking example of reproductive specialization in Australian Iridaceae is the recent discovery of Geosiris australiensis 4 . This fascinating plant represents an extreme case of adaptation—it's an achlorophyllous mycoheterotroph, meaning it lacks chlorophyll and instead obtains nutrients from fungi in the soil.
Australian ecosystems have received numerous Iridaceae introductions, with varying outcomes. Those species that have become successful invaders typically share reproductive traits that align with the experimental findings—they tend to be self-compatible, produce abundant seeds, and can reproduce without specialized pollinators.
The combination of high fecundity and reproductive assurance appears to create a powerful engine for invasion success.
Studying the connection between mating systems and invasiveness requires specialized methods and approaches.
Grow different species or populations under identical conditions to isolate genetic influences on traits from environmental effects.
Control mating by manually transferring pollen to determine compatibility systems and mating flexibility.
Count and assess viability of seeds produced to measure fecundity and reproductive success.
Genetically fingerprint individuals to determine parentage and outcrossing rates.
Preserve and study plant specimens to document morphological traits and reproductive structures.
Account for evolutionary relationships to make valid comparisons between related species.
The compelling association between plant mating systems and invasiveness provides both insight and utility.
Identify genes associated with invasiveness
Test the generality of these patterns across more plant families
Predict how invasive potential might shift with climate change
Understand how disrupted plant-pollinator relationships affect invasion success
The silent invasion of ecosystems by introduced plants represents one of the significant environmental challenges of our time. By understanding the intimate connection between sex and travel in plants, we gain not only scientific knowledge but also the power to make more informed decisions about which plants we welcome into our landscapes—and which we exclude for the protection of our native ecosystems.