Educational Ecology: How Learning Environments Transform Development

Exploring the interconnected systems that shape how we learn, grow, and thrive

More Than Just Classrooms

Imagine two preschoolers: one spends her day mixing mud pies in a forest-style playground, her hands rich with soil microbes; another learns in a sterile, asphalt-covered yard. Within weeks, the first child shows measurable improvements in immune function and cognitive development. This isn't magic—it's educational ecology in action, a revolutionary framework revealing how learning transforms through complex interactions between individuals and their environments.

Educational Ecology

Examines the entire learning ecosystem—physical spaces, social relationships, cultural contexts, and microscopic organisms that collectively shape development.

Educational ecology moves beyond traditional education's focus on curriculum and instruction to examine the entire learning ecosystem—the physical spaces, social relationships, cultural contexts, and even microscopic organisms that collectively shape development. From Finnish forest kindergartens to digital learning networks, educators are leveraging ecological principles to create richer, more effective learning environments. This article explores how understanding these connections is transforming educational theory and practice, revealing why where and how we learn matters as much as what we learn.

What is Educational Ecology? The Science of Learning Ecosystems

Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Model

The theoretical foundations of educational ecology date back more than 75 years, most notably to psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model of human development 7 . Bronfenbrenner envisioned development as occurring within a series of nested environmental systems, each influencing the learner in distinctive ways:

Microsystem

Immediate environments (classroom, family, playground)

Mesosystem

Connections between microsystems (home-school relationships)

Exosystem

External settings indirectly affecting development (school board policies, parent workplaces)

Macrosystem

Broader cultural context (societal values, educational policies)

Chronosystem

Temporal dimension encompassing historical events and transitions

This framework fundamentally shifted educational research from artificially simple laboratory settings to studying learning in actual life situations . Rather than examining educational inputs in isolation, Bronfenbrenner argued we must study the "ecology of a phenomenon"—the complex interplay between multiple systems that collectively shape development .

Learning Ecologies: A Modern Application

Building on Bronfenbrenner's work, contemporary educators discuss STEM learning ecologies—the physical, social, and cultural contexts in which learning takes place over time and across multiple settings 7 . Like natural ecosystems, robust learning ecologies share three key characteristics:

1
Diversity

Multiple pathways and opportunities for engaging with content

2
Redundancy

Overlapping supports that ensure key developmental needs are met

3
Local adaptation

Customized approaches that respect specific community needs and resources

"Learning ecologies are similar to natural ecosystems; they are the contexts—the physical settings, social interactions, value systems, and histories—in which young people learn over time," explains research from the National Science Teachers Association 7 .

This perspective helps educators recognize that learning doesn't occur in isolated classroom moments but develops across the entire lifespan through countless interactions within an individual's learning ecosystem.

The Finnish Experiment: A Case Study in Educational Ecology

Methodology: Bringing the Forest to Preschool

In one of the most compelling recent demonstrations of educational ecology principles, Finnish scientists conducted a novel experiment across 43 daycare centers 1 . The research team, led by scientists from the Natural Resources Institute Finland, hypothesized that increasing children's exposure to natural biodiversity would positively impact their health and development.

The experimental design was both simple and revolutionary:

1
Intervention Group

Daycare centers transformed sterile playgrounds into "forest floors" with specific biodiversity enhancements

2
Control Group

Daycare centers maintained traditional playgrounds with asphalt, sand, gravel, and plastic mats

3
Participants

75 children aged 3-5 across 10 urban daycare centers

4
Data Collection

Researchers monitored changes through biological samples, blood tests, and health questionnaires

Table 1: Biodiversity Interventions in Finnish Daycare Study 1
Intervention Type Specific Elements Educational Purpose
Forest floor installation 10m² carpet, 20-40cm deep soil with blueberries, lingonberries, moss Encourage foraging, bug hunting, nature connection
Vegetable gardens Beetroots, carrots, cucumbers, potatoes, courgettes, chillies Teach food origins, responsibility through care
Natural play materials Soil, sand, leaves, decaying wood, rocks Sensory development, creative play
Wetland area Rocks for balancing, water plants Physical challenge, ecosystem exploration

Remarkable Results: Immune Systems and Learning Transformed

The findings from the Finnish experiment revealed profound ecological connections between environment and development. Within just 28 days, children in the green daycare centers showed significant biological changes compared to the control group 1 :

  • Immune system enhancement
  • Microbiome improvements
  • Health benefits
  • Behavioral changes
  • Reduced disease-causing bacteria
  • Fewer infectious diseases

The implications extend far beyond physical health. The study demonstrated a causal relationship between environmental biodiversity and children's developmental outcomes—what researchers call the "old friends hypothesis." This suggests humans evolved alongside beneficial microbes in natural environments, and our bodies actually require these microscopic "old friends" to develop properly functioning immune systems 1 .

Table 2: Health Outcomes in Finnish Biodiversity Study 1
Health Marker Intervention Group Results Control Group Results Significance
T regulatory cells Significant increase No significant change Protection against autoimmune diseases
Skin microbiota Reduced Streptococcus No change Fewer disease-causing bacteria
Gut microbiota Reduced Clostridium No change Lower inflammatory bowel disease risk
Infectious diseases Fewer reported cases No significant reduction Improved overall health

Core Properties of Robust Educational Ecologies

Educational ecologies share distinctive properties that differentiate them from traditional learning environments. Drawing from both the Finnish experiment and broader ecological research, we can identify four fundamental characteristics:

Table 3: Defining Properties of Educational Ecologies
Property Definition Example from Research
Contextual Validity Research and learning occur in actual life situations rather than artificial laboratories Finnish study conducted in actual daycare centers, not lab settings
Reciprocal Processes Recognition that learners both influence and are influenced by their environments Children's play activities shaped the microbial environment while being shaped by it
Temporal Dimension Understanding that learning develops across time—throughout the day and across the lifespan 7 Immune changes observed over 28 days, but learning continues through lifetime
Cross-Setting Integration Intentional connections between different learning environments (school, home, community) 7 HIVE NYC network linking museums, schools, libraries for coordinated learning

These properties highlight why ecological approaches often produce more meaningful and lasting educational outcomes than traditional methods. By working with, rather than against, natural developmental processes, educational ecologies create self-reinforcing cycles of engagement and growth.

The Educational Ecologist's Toolkit: Practical Applications

For Teachers and Schools

Educators can apply ecological principles immediately through these evidence-based strategies:

Connect learning across settings

Build bridges between classroom content and students' out-of-school experiences and interests. "Teachers who are aware of a young person's interest in animal life can let that child and her parents know about summer camps or internships at local zoos or nature centers," suggests research from NSTA 7 .

Recognize diverse "funds of knowledge"

Value the cultural resources, languages, and social practices students bring from their homes and communities. For instance, children's video-gaming skills can support project-based learning, while their experiences with family activities might inform scientific inquiries 7 .

Create responsive physical environments

Whether through biodiversity-rich playgrounds or flexible classroom layouts, design spaces that encourage interaction, exploration, and different types of engagement.

For Policy Makers and Community Leaders

Building robust educational ecologies requires systemic thinking and cross-sector collaboration:

Support network initiatives

Programs like HIVE NYC (linking 56 informal learning organizations) create infrastructure for learning pathways across entire communities 7 .

Fund ecological research

Support studies that examine learning across multiple contexts and over extended timeframes, rather than short-term isolated interventions.

Develop brokering systems

Create mechanisms that help educators connect students with relevant learning opportunities beyond school walls, matching youth interests to community resources.

Conclusion: Cultivating Healthier Learning Ecosystems

The evidence from educational ecology is clear: learning never occurs in a vacuum. From the microscopic bacteria that train our immune systems to the broad cultural contexts that shape our understandings, we are deeply interconnected with our educational environments. The Finnish experiment demonstrates this profound connection literally at a biological level—our bodies are healthier, and potentially our minds more receptive, when learning occurs in rich, diverse, natural settings.

As educational ecologist Urie Bronfenbrenner proposed decades ago, we must restructure prevailing educational systems "by redefining goals, roles, and activities, and by providing interconnections between systems" . This means breaking down barriers between schools and communities, between disciplines, and between learners and their environments. The future of education depends not on better textbooks or standardized tests, but on cultivating more vibrant, diverse, and interconnected learning ecosystems where every learner can find multiple pathways to growth.

"More and more people are saying they want to make these daycares in their towns," says Finnish scientist Marja Roslund. The vision is spreading—one mud pie, one microbial exchange, one connected learning experience at a time 1 .

The challenge ahead is to apply these ecological principles more intentionally and consistently—to design learning environments that work with, rather than against, the natural processes of human development. Whether you're a teacher arranging a classroom, a parent choosing activities, or a policy maker allocating resources, we all share responsibility for tending the educational ecosystems that shape our collective future.

References